Maldivian Democratic Party moves to dismiss parliament speaker Mohamed Nasheed


In a surprising turn of events, the Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) has announced its intention to initiate the dismissal of Parliament Speaker Mohamed Nasheed. This decision came after several days of complaints by MDP members regarding Nasheed’s handling of parliamentary proceedings. Efforts to gather enough signatures for a no-confidence motion against Nasheed have already begun following this announcement.

During a parliamentary group meeting, a significant majority of 36 out of 41 attending members voted in favor of expressing their lack of confidence in Nasheed’s ability to serve as the parliament speaker. This indicates a growing negative sentiment towards Nasheed within his own party, which is noteworthy considering his prominent role in the MDP.

One of the major factors contributing to the dissatisfaction with Nasheed was his decision to prematurely conclude a sitting, which impeded the progress of a no-confidence motion against Attorney General Ibrahim Riffath. The motion, submitted by an opposition alliance, focused on the border dispute between the Maldives and Mauritius. Nasheed’s action of abruptly ending the session hindered the debate on the motion, further fueling discontent among MDP members.

During the session, a privileged motion was submitted accusing Riffath of undermining the parliament’s powers. Nasheed proposed that the motion be submitted directly to the Privileges Committee or to the floor. However, he noted that the establishment of parliamentary committees, including the Privileges Committee, was still incomplete, complicating the decision-making process.

A vote was held to determine whether the privileged motion would be accepted for debate. MDP lawmakers voted against accepting the motion, triggering heated arguments between the two sides. The session quickly descended into chaos, leading Speaker Nasheed to call for a recess. Unfortunately, the parliament failed to resume proceedings even after the recess, leaving matters unresolved.

It is important to note that the MDP, apart from Nasheed, holds a significant presence in the parliament with 55 lawmakers. To successfully pass a no-confidence motion, at least 43 votes are required. Therefore, if the MDP decides to pursue Nasheed’s dismissal, they have the necessary numbers to remove him from his position.

The decision by the MDP parliamentary group to initiate the dismissal of Parliament Speaker Mohamed Nasheed marks a significant development in Maldivian politics. The situation is likely to have far-reaching consequences within the MDP and the broader political landscape of the Maldives. As events unfold, it remains to be seen how the dynamics between the MDP, Nasheed, and other political factions will evolve and shape the future of the Maldivian parliament.